again, please read the Guidance on Conflict section on harassment vs criticism for an example of a productive post.
EXAMPLES
OK
Laying out the facts with clear supporting evidence in an appropriate place, without including your personal opinion with the evidence.
e.g.: Project XYZ transferred their funds on xx day, as you can see in this transaction 0x…. This action clearly violated the no sale rule outlined in the Operating Manual{link}. I have started a thread in the Monitoring governance forum{link}, if anyone else has evidence please add it.
The team has no control over tokens that are already distributed.
Good criticism includes:
- include links to transactions
- collect information in one place
- suggest possible solutions